1968 Suzuki Fronte vs. 2012 Dacia Logan
To start off, 2012 Dacia Logan is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Dacia Logan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Dacia Logan (87 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1968 Suzuki Fronte. (35 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Dacia Logan should accelerate faster than 1968 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Dacia Logan weights approximately 295 kg more than 1968 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Dacia Logan (127 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Suzuki Fronte. (81 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2012 Dacia Logan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Suzuki Fronte | 2012 Dacia Logan | |
Make | Suzuki | Dacia |
Model | Fronte | Logan |
Year Released | 1968 | 2012 |
Engine Size | 785 cc | 1598 cc |
Horse Power | 35 HP | 87 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 81 Nm | 127 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 1055 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.9 L/100km | 7.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 50 L |