1968 Toyota Corolla vs. 2010 Renault Fluence
To start off, 2010 Renault Fluence is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Toyota Corolla. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Toyota Corolla would be higher. At 1,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Renault Fluence is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Renault Fluence (110 HP) has 51 more horse power than 1968 Toyota Corolla. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Renault Fluence should accelerate faster than 1968 Toyota Corolla. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Renault Fluence weights approximately 525 kg more than 1968 Toyota Corolla. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Toyota Corolla is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Toyota Corolla. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Renault Fluence, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Toyota Corolla | 2010 Renault Fluence | |
Make | Toyota | Renault |
Model | Corolla | Fluence |
Year Released | 1968 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1077 cc | 1500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 110 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 700 kg | 1225 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4618 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1809 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1478 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2702 mm |