1968 Toyota Corolla vs. 2011 Nissan Leaf
To start off, 2011 Nissan Leaf is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Toyota Corolla. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Toyota Corolla would be higher.
Because 1968 Toyota Corolla is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Toyota Corolla. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Leaf, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Toyota Corolla | 2011 Nissan Leaf | |
| Make | Toyota | Nissan |
| Model | Corolla | Leaf |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Type | in-line | electric |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4445 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1549 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2700 mm |
