1968 Toyota Corona vs. 2012 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2012 Holden Cruze is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Toyota Corona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Toyota Corona would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Holden Cruze is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Cruze (139 HP) has 69 more horse power than 1968 Toyota Corona. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Cruze should accelerate faster than 1968 Toyota Corona.
Because 1968 Toyota Corona is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Toyota Corona. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Cruze (176 Nm) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Toyota Corona. (115 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Cruze will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Toyota Corona.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Toyota Corona | 2012 Holden Cruze | |
Make | Toyota | Holden |
Model | Corona | Cruze |
Year Released | 1968 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1490 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 139 HP |
Torque | 115 Nm | 176 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4120 mm | 4597 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1788 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1477 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2685 mm |