1968 Triumph 2000 vs. 2001 Saturn SC
To start off, 2001 Saturn SC is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Saturn SC (100 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1968 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Saturn SC should accelerate faster than 1968 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 100 kg more than 2001 Saturn SC.
Let's talk about torque, 1968 Triumph 2000 (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Saturn SC. (155 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1968 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Saturn SC.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Triumph 2000 | 2001 Saturn SC | |
Make | Triumph | Saturn |
Model | 2000 | SC |
Year Released | 1968 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1900 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 158 Nm | 155 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 9.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 1070 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 60 L |