1968 Triumph 2000 vs. 2010 Ford C-Max
To start off, 2010 Ford C-Max is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford C-Max (150 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 1968 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford C-Max should accelerate faster than 1968 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford C-Max weights approximately 380 kg more than 1968 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford C-Max (270 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 112 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Ford C-Max will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Triumph 2000 | 2010 Ford C-Max | |
Make | Triumph | Ford |
Model | 2000 | C-Max |
Year Released | 1968 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 150 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 158 Nm | 270 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 1550 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1828 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1684 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2788 mm |