1968 Triumph 2000 vs. 2011 Ford Mondeo
To start off, 2011 Ford Mondeo is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford Mondeo (138 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1968 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford Mondeo should accelerate faster than 1968 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Ford Mondeo weights approximately 406 kg more than 1968 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 Ford Mondeo (320 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 162 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2011 Ford Mondeo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Triumph 2000 | 2011 Ford Mondeo | |
Make | Triumph | Ford |
Model | 2000 | Mondeo |
Year Released | 1968 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 158 Nm | 320 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 17.9:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 1576 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 4840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2860 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 70 L |