1968 Triumph 2000 vs. 2011 SSC Aero
To start off, 2011 SSC Aero is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 SSC Aero is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 SSC Aero (1,062 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 973 more horse power than 1968 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 SSC Aero should accelerate faster than 1968 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 SSC Aero weights approximately 123 kg more than 1968 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 SSC Aero (1,357 Nm @ 5800 RPM) has 1199 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2011 SSC Aero will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Triumph 2000 | 2011 SSC Aero | |
| Make | Triumph | SSC |
| Model | 2000 | Aero |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 1062 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6600 RPM |
| Torque | 158 Nm | 1357 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 1293 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 4470 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 2080 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1090 mm |
