1968 Triumph 2.5 vs. 2002 Acura CL
To start off, 2002 Acura CL is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Triumph 2.5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Triumph 2.5 would be higher. At 3,210 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Acura CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Acura CL (260 HP @ 6900 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 1968 Triumph 2.5. (150 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Acura CL should accelerate faster than 1968 Triumph 2.5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Acura CL weights approximately 447 kg more than 1968 Triumph 2.5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Triumph 2.5 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Triumph 2.5. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Acura CL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Acura CL (315 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 93 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Triumph 2.5. (222 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2002 Acura CL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Triumph 2.5.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Triumph 2.5 | 2002 Acura CL | |
Make | Triumph | Acura |
Model | 2.5 | CL |
Year Released | 1968 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2498 cc | 3210 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 260 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6900 RPM |
Torque | 222 Nm | 315 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 74.7 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 95 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1133 kg | 1580 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 65 L |