1968 Triumph Herald vs. 2012 Peugeot RCZ
To start off, 2012 Peugeot RCZ is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Triumph Herald. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Triumph Herald would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Peugeot RCZ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Peugeot RCZ (197 HP) has 159 more horse power than 1968 Triumph Herald. (38 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Peugeot RCZ should accelerate faster than 1968 Triumph Herald.
Because 1968 Triumph Herald is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Triumph Herald. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Peugeot RCZ, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Triumph Herald | 2012 Peugeot RCZ | |
Make | Triumph | Peugeot |
Model | Herald | RCZ |
Year Released | 1968 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1147 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 197 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4287 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1845 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1359 mm |