1968 Volkswagen 1600 vs. 2012 Dodge Charger
To start off, 2012 Dodge Charger is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Volkswagen 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Volkswagen 1600 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Dodge Charger (292 HP @ 6350 RPM) has 243 more horse power than 1968 Volkswagen 1600. (49 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 1968 Volkswagen 1600.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Volkswagen 1600 | 2012 Dodge Charger | |
Make | Volkswagen | Dodge |
Model | 1600 | Charger |
Year Released | 1968 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1584 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 292 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6350 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 5077 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1905 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1483 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 3053 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 72 L |