1968 Volkswagen 1600 vs. 2013 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2013 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Volkswagen 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Volkswagen 1600 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jeep Wrangler (281 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 232 more horse power than 1968 Volkswagen 1600. (49 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1968 Volkswagen 1600.
Because 2013 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Volkswagen 1600. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Volkswagen 1600 | 2013 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Volkswagen | Jeep |
Model | 1600 | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1968 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1584 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 281 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4161 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1872 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1834 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2423 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 70 L |