1968 Volkswagen 1600 vs. 2013 Volvo C30
To start off, 2013 Volvo C30 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Volkswagen 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Volkswagen 1600 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (5 cylinders), 2013 Volvo C30 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volvo C30 (224 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 175 more horse power than 1968 Volkswagen 1600. (49 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volvo C30 should accelerate faster than 1968 Volkswagen 1600.
Because 1968 Volkswagen 1600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Volkswagen 1600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Volvo C30, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Volkswagen 1600 | 2013 Volvo C30 | |
| Make | Volkswagen | Volvo |
| Model | 1600 | C30 |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1584 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 49 HP | 224 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4266 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 2039 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1447 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2640 mm |
