1968 Volvo 120 vs. 2009 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2009 Holden Cruze is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Volvo 120. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Volvo 120 would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Holden Cruze is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Cruze (148 HP) has 81 more horse power than 1968 Volvo 120. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Cruze should accelerate faster than 1968 Volvo 120.
Because 1968 Volvo 120 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Volvo 120. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden Cruze (320 Nm) has 176 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Volvo 120. (144 Nm). This means 2009 Holden Cruze will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Volvo 120.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Volvo 120 | 2009 Holden Cruze | |
Make | Volvo | Holden |
Model | 120 | Cruze |
Year Released | 1968 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1777 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 144 Nm | 320 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4597 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1788 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1477 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2685 mm |