1968 Volvo 120 vs. 2009 Holden UTE
To start off, 2009 Holden UTE is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Volvo 120. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Volvo 120 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden UTE (357 HP) has 290 more horse power than 1968 Volvo 120. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1968 Volvo 120.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden UTE (530 Nm) has 386 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Volvo 120. (144 Nm). This means 2009 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Volvo 120.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Volvo 120 | 2009 Holden UTE | |
Make | Volvo | Holden |
Model | 120 | UTE |
Year Released | 1968 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1777 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 357 HP |
Torque | 144 Nm | 530 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |