1968 Volvo 120 vs. 2009 Peugeot 207
To start off, 2009 Peugeot 207 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Volvo 120. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Volvo 120 would be higher. At 1,777 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 Volvo 120 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Peugeot 207 (110 HP) has 6 more horse power than 1968 Volvo 120. (104 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Peugeot 207 should accelerate faster than 1968 Volvo 120.
Because 1968 Volvo 120 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Volvo 120. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Peugeot 207, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Volvo 120 | 2009 Peugeot 207 | |
| Make | Volvo | Peugeot |
| Model | 120 | 207 |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1777 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 110 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4044 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1972 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1397 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 50 L |
