1968 Volvo 120 vs. 2010 Renault Fluence
To start off, 2010 Renault Fluence is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Volvo 120. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Volvo 120 would be higher. At 1,777 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 Volvo 120 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Renault Fluence (110 HP) has 43 more horse power than 1968 Volvo 120. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Renault Fluence should accelerate faster than 1968 Volvo 120. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Renault Fluence weights approximately 215 kg more than 1968 Volvo 120. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Volvo 120 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Volvo 120. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Renault Fluence, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Volvo 120 | 2010 Renault Fluence | |
| Make | Volvo | Renault |
| Model | 120 | Fluence |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1777 cc | 1500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 67 HP | 110 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1010 kg | 1225 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4618 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1809 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1478 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2702 mm |
