1968 Volvo 120 vs. 2012 Chevrolet Aveo
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Aveo is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Volvo 120. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Volvo 120 would be higher. At 1,777 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 Volvo 120 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Volvo 120 (104 HP) has 36 more horse power than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo. (68 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Volvo 120 should accelerate faster than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo.
Because 1968 Volvo 120 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Volvo 120. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Aveo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Volvo 120 (152 Nm) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo. (115 Nm). This means 1968 Volvo 120 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Volvo 120 | 2012 Chevrolet Aveo | |
| Make | Volvo | Chevrolet |
| Model | 120 | Aveo |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1777 cc | 1206 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 68 HP |
| Torque | 152 Nm | 115 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4039 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1735 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1516 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2525 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 46 L |
