1968 Volvo 120 vs. 2012 Chevrolet Malibu
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Volvo 120. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Volvo 120 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Chevrolet Malibu (252 HP) has 185 more horse power than 1968 Volvo 120. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1968 Volvo 120.
Because 1968 Volvo 120 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Volvo 120. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Malibu, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Chevrolet Malibu (340 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 196 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Volvo 120. (144 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2012 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Volvo 120.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Volvo 120 | 2012 Chevrolet Malibu | |
Make | Volvo | Chevrolet |
Model | 120 | Malibu |
Year Released | 1968 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1777 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 252 HP |
Torque | 144 Nm | 340 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2300 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4872 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1786 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2852 mm |