1968 Volvo 145 vs. 2011 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2011 Holden Cruze is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Volvo 145. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Volvo 145 would be higher. At 1,986 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 Volvo 145 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Holden Cruze (139 HP) has 58 more horse power than 1968 Volvo 145. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Holden Cruze should accelerate faster than 1968 Volvo 145.
Because 1968 Volvo 145 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Volvo 145. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Holden Cruze (176 Nm) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Volvo 145. (157 Nm). This means 2011 Holden Cruze will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Volvo 145.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Volvo 145 | 2011 Holden Cruze | |
Make | Volvo | Holden |
Model | 145 | Cruze |
Year Released | 1968 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1986 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 139 HP |
Torque | 157 Nm | 176 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 4597 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1788 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1477 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2685 mm |