1968 Zastava 1300 vs. 2010 Renault Laguna
To start off, 2010 Renault Laguna is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Renault Laguna is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Renault Laguna (168 HP) has 115 more horse power than 1968 Zastava 1300. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Renault Laguna should accelerate faster than 1968 Zastava 1300.
Because 1968 Zastava 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Zastava 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Renault Laguna, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Renault Laguna (270 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 177 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2010 Renault Laguna will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Zastava 1300.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Zastava 1300 | 2010 Renault Laguna | |
| Make | Zastava | Renault |
| Model | 1300 | Laguna |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2010 |
| Engine Size | 1295 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 168 HP |
| Torque | 93 Nm | 270 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4590 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1440 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2750 mm |
