1968 Zastava 1300 vs. 2011 Opel Meriva
To start off, 2011 Opel Meriva is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 1,398 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Opel Meriva is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Opel Meriva (118 HP) has 65 more horse power than 1968 Zastava 1300. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Opel Meriva should accelerate faster than 1968 Zastava 1300.
Because 1968 Zastava 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Zastava 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Opel Meriva, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Opel Meriva (175 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2011 Opel Meriva will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Zastava 1300.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Zastava 1300 | 2011 Opel Meriva | |
| Make | Zastava | Opel |
| Model | 1300 | Meriva |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2011 |
| Engine Size | 1295 cc | 1398 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 118 HP |
| Torque | 93 Nm | 175 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 1750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
