1968 Zastava 850 K vs. 2003 Acura CL
To start off, 2003 Acura CL is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 3,179 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Acura CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Acura CL (260 HP @ 6900 RPM) has 225 more horse power than 1968 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Acura CL should accelerate faster than 1968 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Acura CL weights approximately 725 kg more than 1968 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Zastava 850 K is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Zastava 850 K. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Acura CL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Zastava 850 K | 2003 Acura CL | |
Make | Zastava | Acura |
Model | 850 K | CL |
Year Released | 1968 | 2003 |
Engine Size | 848 cc | 3179 cc |
Horse Power | 35 HP | 260 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 855 kg | 1580 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3740 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2730 mm |