1968 Zastava 850 K vs. 2010 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2010 Volvo XC60 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 2,000 cc (5 cylinders), 2010 Volvo XC60 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo XC60 weights approximately 1066 kg more than 1968 Zastava 850 K.
Because 2010 Volvo XC60 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Zastava 850 K. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volvo XC60 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Zastava 850 K | 2010 Volvo XC60 | |
| Make | Zastava | Volvo |
| Model | 850 K | XC60 |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2010 |
| Engine Size | 848 cc | 2000 cc |
| Horse Power | 35 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Vehicle Weight | 855 kg | 1921 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3740 mm | 4628 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1890 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1712 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2748 mm |
