1968 Zastava 850 K vs. 2011 Cadillac SRX
To start off, 2011 Cadillac SRX is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Cadillac SRX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Cadillac SRX (265 HP @ 6950 RPM) has 230 more horse power than 1968 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Cadillac SRX should accelerate faster than 1968 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Cadillac SRX weights approximately 1061 kg more than 1968 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Zastava 850 K is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Zastava 850 K. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Cadillac SRX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Zastava 850 K | 2011 Cadillac SRX | |
| Make | Zastava | Cadillac |
| Model | 850 K | SRX |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2011 |
| Engine Size | 848 cc | 3000 cc |
| Horse Power | 35 HP | 265 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6950 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 855 kg | 1916 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3740 mm | 4834 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1669 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2807 mm |
