1968 Zastava 850 K vs. 2012 BMW X1
To start off, 2012 BMW X1 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 BMW X1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 BMW X1 (202 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 167 more horse power than 1968 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 BMW X1 should accelerate faster than 1968 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 BMW X1 weights approximately 815 kg more than 1968 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 BMW X1 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Zastava 850 K. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 BMW X1 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Zastava 850 K | 2012 BMW X1 | |
| Make | Zastava | BMW |
| Model | 850 K | X1 |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2012 |
| Engine Size | 848 cc | 1995 cc |
| Horse Power | 35 HP | 202 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Vehicle Weight | 855 kg | 1670 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3740 mm | 4454 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1798 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1545 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2760 mm |
