1968 ZAZ 966 vs. 2012 Audi Q3
To start off, 2012 Audi Q3 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 ZAZ 966. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 ZAZ 966 would be higher. At 1,984 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Audi Q3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi Q3 (168 HP @ 4300 RPM) has 130 more horse power than 1968 ZAZ 966. (38 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi Q3 should accelerate faster than 1968 ZAZ 966.
Because 2012 Audi Q3 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 ZAZ 966. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi Q3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Audi Q3 (280 Nm @ 1700 RPM) has 208 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 ZAZ 966. (72 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2012 Audi Q3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 ZAZ 966.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 ZAZ 966 | 2012 Audi Q3 | |
| Make | ZAZ | Audi |
| Model | 966 | Q3 |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1196 cc | 1984 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 38 HP | 168 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4300 RPM |
| Torque | 72 Nm | 280 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2900 RPM | 1700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3740 mm | 4390 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1600 mm |
