1968 ZAZ 966 vs. 2012 Mercedes-Benz B
To start off, 2012 Mercedes-Benz B is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 ZAZ 966. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 ZAZ 966 would be higher. At 1,595 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mercedes-Benz B is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mercedes-Benz B (156 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 129 more horse power than 1968 ZAZ 966. (27 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mercedes-Benz B should accelerate faster than 1968 ZAZ 966.
Because 1968 ZAZ 966 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 ZAZ 966. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mercedes-Benz B, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mercedes-Benz B (250 Nm @ 1250 RPM) has 198 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 ZAZ 966. (52 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2012 Mercedes-Benz B will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 ZAZ 966.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 ZAZ 966 | 2012 Mercedes-Benz B | |
| Make | ZAZ | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | 966 | B |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 887 cc | 1595 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 27 HP | 156 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Torque | 52 Nm | 250 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 1250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3740 mm | 4359 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1786 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1557 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2170 mm | 2699 mm |
