1969 Abarth 1300 vs. 1988 Ford Taurus
To start off, 1988 Ford Taurus is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 2,985 cc (6 cylinders), 1988 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1988 Ford Taurus (220 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 1969 Abarth 1300. (123 HP @ 7200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1988 Ford Taurus should accelerate faster than 1969 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1988 Ford Taurus weights approximately 864 kg more than 1969 Abarth 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1969 Abarth 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Abarth 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Ford Taurus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1988 Ford Taurus (271 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 141 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Abarth 1300. (130 Nm @ 6000 RPM). This means 1988 Ford Taurus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Abarth 1300.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Abarth 1300 | 1988 Ford Taurus | |
Make | Abarth | Ford |
Model | 1300 | Taurus |
Year Released | 1969 | 1988 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 2985 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 220 HP |
Engine RPM | 7200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 130 Nm | 271 Nm |
Torque RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 71 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.6:1 | 9.8:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 636 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 45 L |