1969 Abarth 1300 vs. 2003 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2003 Ford Ecosport is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Ecosport (143 HP) has 20 more horse power than 1969 Abarth 1300. (123 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1969 Abarth 1300.
Because 1969 Abarth 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Abarth 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Abarth 1300 | 2003 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Abarth | Ford |
| Model | 1300 | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1280 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 143 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2490 mm |
