1969 Abarth 1300 vs. 2004 Pontiac Aztek
To start off, 2004 Pontiac Aztek is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 3,392 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Pontiac Aztek is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Pontiac Aztek (176 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 1969 Abarth 1300. (123 HP @ 7200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Pontiac Aztek should accelerate faster than 1969 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Pontiac Aztek weights approximately 1194 kg more than 1969 Abarth 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Pontiac Aztek is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Abarth 1300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Pontiac Aztek will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Pontiac Aztek (298 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 168 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Abarth 1300. (130 Nm @ 6000 RPM). This means 2004 Pontiac Aztek will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Abarth 1300.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Abarth 1300 | 2004 Pontiac Aztek | |
Make | Abarth | Pontiac |
Model | 1300 | Aztek |
Year Released | 1969 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 3392 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 176 HP |
Engine RPM | 7200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 130 Nm | 298 Nm |
Torque RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 71 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.6:1 | 8.6:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 636 kg | 1830 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 4630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 69 L |