1969 Abarth 1300 vs. 2006 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 5,965 cc, 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (400 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 277 more horse power than 1969 Abarth 1300. (123 HP @ 7200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1969 Abarth 1300.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac CTS (536 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 406 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Abarth 1300. (130 Nm @ 6000 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Abarth 1300.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Abarth 1300 | 2006 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Abarth | Cadillac |
Model | 1300 | CTS |
Year Released | 1969 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 5965 cc |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 400 HP |
Engine RPM | 7200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 130 Nm | 536 Nm |
Torque RPM | 6000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2890 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 64 L |