1969 Abarth 1300 vs. 2010 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2010 Jaguar XF is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 2,200 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jaguar XF (187 HP) has 64 more horse power than 1969 Abarth 1300. (123 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1969 Abarth 1300.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jaguar XF (450 Nm) has 320 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Abarth 1300. (130 Nm). This means 2010 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Abarth 1300.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Abarth 1300 | 2010 Jaguar XF | |
| Make | Abarth | Jaguar |
| Model | 1300 | XF |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1280 cc | 2200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 187 HP |
| Torque | 130 Nm | 450 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 4961 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1877 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1461 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2908 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 70 L |
