1969 Abarth 2000 vs. 1949 Jeep CJ3A
To start off, 1969 Abarth 2000 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Jeep CJ3A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Jeep CJ3A would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1949 Jeep CJ3A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Abarth 2000 (221 HP @ 7600 RPM) has 162 more horse power than 1949 Jeep CJ3A. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Abarth 2000 should accelerate faster than 1949 Jeep CJ3A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Jeep CJ3A weights approximately 440 kg more than 1969 Abarth 2000.
Because 1949 Jeep CJ3A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Abarth 2000. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1949 Jeep CJ3A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Abarth 2000 | 1949 Jeep CJ3A | |
| Make | Abarth | Jeep |
| Model | 2000 | CJ3A |
| Year Released | 1969 | 1949 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 1946 cc | 2199 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 221 HP | 59 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 670 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 3130 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1460 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 980 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2090 mm | 2040 mm |
