1969 Abarth 2000 vs. 1952 Allard K2
To start off, 1969 Abarth 2000 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Abarth 2000 (221 HP @ 7600 RPM) has 136 more horse power than 1952 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Abarth 2000 should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Allard K2 weights approximately 530 kg more than 1969 Abarth 2000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Abarth 2000 | 1952 Allard K2 | |
| Make | Abarth | Allard |
| Model | 2000 | K2 |
| Year Released | 1969 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 1946 cc | 3622 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 221 HP | 85 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 3 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 670 kg | 1200 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4270 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 980 mm | 1580 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2090 mm | 2700 mm |
