1969 Abarth 2000 vs. 1952 Triumph Renown
To start off, 1969 Abarth 2000 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Triumph Renown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Triumph Renown would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Triumph Renown is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Abarth 2000 (221 HP @ 7600 RPM) has 155 more horse power than 1952 Triumph Renown. (66 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Abarth 2000 should accelerate faster than 1952 Triumph Renown. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Triumph Renown weights approximately 610 kg more than 1969 Abarth 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Abarth 2000 | 1952 Triumph Renown | |
| Make | Abarth | Triumph |
| Model | 2000 | Renown |
| Year Released | 1969 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 1946 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 221 HP | 66 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 88 mm | 85 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 92 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 670 kg | 1280 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 980 mm | 1610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2090 mm | 2750 mm |
