1969 Abarth 2000 vs. 1953 Triumph Mayflower
To start off, 1969 Abarth 2000 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Triumph Mayflower. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Triumph Mayflower would be higher. At 1,946 cc (4 cylinders), 1969 Abarth 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Abarth 2000 (221 HP @ 7600 RPM) has 184 more horse power than 1953 Triumph Mayflower. (37 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Abarth 2000 should accelerate faster than 1953 Triumph Mayflower. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Triumph Mayflower weights approximately 284 kg more than 1969 Abarth 2000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Abarth 2000 | 1953 Triumph Mayflower | |
Make | Abarth | Triumph |
Model | 2000 | Mayflower |
Year Released | 1969 | 1953 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1946 cc | 1247 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 221 HP | 37 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88 mm | 63 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 100 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 6.8:1 |
Top Speed | 275 km/hour | 106 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 670 kg | 954 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 3920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 980 mm | 1580 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2090 mm | 2110 mm |