1969 Abarth 2000 vs. 1958 AC Aceca
To start off, 1969 Abarth 2000 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 AC Aceca would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Abarth 2000 (221 HP @ 7600 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 1958 AC Aceca. (123 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Abarth 2000 should accelerate faster than 1958 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 AC Aceca weights approximately 224 kg more than 1969 Abarth 2000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Abarth 2000 | 1958 AC Aceca | |
Make | Abarth | AC |
Model | 2000 | Aceca |
Year Released | 1969 | 1958 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1946 cc | 1971 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 221 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88 mm | 66 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 96 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 670 kg | 894 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1560 mm |
Vehicle Height | 980 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2090 mm | 2290 mm |