1969 Abarth 2000 vs. 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II
To start off, 1969 Abarth 2000 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Abarth 2000 (221 HP @ 7600 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II. (129 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Abarth 2000 should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II weights approximately 488 kg more than 1969 Abarth 2000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Abarth 2000 | 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II | |
Make | Abarth | Austin-Healey |
Model | 2000 | 3000 Mk II |
Year Released | 1969 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1946 cc | 2912 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 221 HP | 129 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88 mm | 83.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 88.9 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
Top Speed | 275 km/hour | 181 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 670 kg | 1158 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 980 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2090 mm | 2340 mm |