1969 Abarth 2000 vs. 1980 Austin Mini Metro
To start off, 1980 Austin Mini Metro is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Abarth 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Abarth 2000 would be higher. At 1,946 cc (4 cylinders), 1969 Abarth 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Abarth 2000 (221 HP @ 7600 RPM) has 176 more horse power than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. (45 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Abarth 2000 should accelerate faster than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Austin Mini Metro weights approximately 77 kg more than 1969 Abarth 2000.
Because 1969 Abarth 2000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Abarth 2000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Austin Mini Metro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Abarth 2000 | 1980 Austin Mini Metro | |
Make | Abarth | Austin |
Model | 2000 | Mini Metro |
Year Released | 1969 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1946 cc | 998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 221 HP | 45 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 10.3:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 670 kg | 747 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 3410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 980 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2090 mm | 2260 mm |