1969 Abarth 2000 vs. 1986 Caterham 1700
To start off, 1986 Caterham 1700 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Abarth 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Abarth 2000 would be higher. At 1,946 cc (4 cylinders), 1969 Abarth 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Abarth 2000 (221 HP @ 7600 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 1986 Caterham 1700. (168 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Abarth 2000 should accelerate faster than 1986 Caterham 1700.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Abarth 2000 | 1986 Caterham 1700 | |
| Make | Abarth | Caterham |
| Model | 2000 | 1700 |
| Year Released | 1969 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 1946 cc | 1692 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 221 HP | 168 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 11.0:1 |
| Top Speed | 275 km/hour | 188 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 3390 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 980 mm | 1050 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2090 mm | 2260 mm |
