1969 Abarth 2000 vs. 2000 BMW Z9
To start off, 2000 BMW Z9 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Abarth 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Abarth 2000 would be higher. At 4,398 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 BMW Z9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW Z9 (282 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 1969 Abarth 2000. (221 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW Z9 should accelerate faster than 1969 Abarth 2000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Abarth 2000 | 2000 BMW Z9 | |
| Make | Abarth | BMW |
| Model | 2000 | Z9 |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 1946 cc | 4398 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 221 HP | 282 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 88 mm | 92 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 82.7 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 5010 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 980 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2090 mm | 3110 mm |
