1969 Abarth 2000 vs. 2000 Ford Cougar
To start off, 2000 Ford Cougar is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Abarth 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Abarth 2000 would be higher. At 1,988 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Ford Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Abarth 2000 (221 HP @ 7600 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 2000 Ford Cougar. (129 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Abarth 2000 should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Cougar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Cougar weights approximately 660 kg more than 1969 Abarth 2000.
Because 1969 Abarth 2000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Abarth 2000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Ford Cougar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Abarth 2000 | 2000 Ford Cougar | |
| Make | Abarth | Ford |
| Model | 2000 | Cougar |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 1946 cc | 1988 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 221 HP | 129 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 88 mm | 84.9 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 87.9 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 670 kg | 1330 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4710 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 980 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2090 mm | 2710 mm |
