1969 Abarth 2000 vs. 2003 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2003 Ford Mustang is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Abarth 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Abarth 2000 would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Mustang (400 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 179 more horse power than 1969 Abarth 2000. (221 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1969 Abarth 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Mustang weights approximately 822 kg more than 1969 Abarth 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Abarth 2000 | 2003 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Abarth | Ford |
Model | 2000 | Mustang |
Year Released | 1969 | 2003 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1946 cc | 4601 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 221 HP | 400 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88 mm | 90.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 90 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 670 kg | 1492 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 980 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2090 mm | 2490 mm |