1969 Abarth 2000 vs. 2003 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2003 Smart ForTwo is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Abarth 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Abarth 2000 would be higher. At 1,946 cc (4 cylinders), 1969 Abarth 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Abarth 2000 (221 HP @ 7600 RPM) has 161 more horse power than 2003 Smart ForTwo. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Abarth 2000 should accelerate faster than 2003 Smart ForTwo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Smart ForTwo weights approximately 145 kg more than 1969 Abarth 2000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Abarth 2000 | 2003 Smart ForTwo | |
Make | Abarth | Smart |
Model | 2000 | ForTwo |
Year Released | 1969 | 2003 |
Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
Engine Position | Middle | Rear |
Engine Size | 1946 cc | 698 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 221 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88 mm | 66.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 67 mm |
Top Speed | 275 km/hour | 135 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 670 kg | 815 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 2510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 980 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2090 mm | 1820 mm |