1969 Abarth OT vs. 1982 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 1982 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Abarth OT would be higher. At 6,030 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 1100 kg more than 1969 Abarth OT.
Because 1969 Abarth OT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Abarth OT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Abarth OT | 1982 Cadillac DeVille | |
| Make | Abarth | Cadillac |
| Model | OT | DeVille |
| Year Released | 1969 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1946 cc | 6030 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1910 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 5620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1950 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 3090 mm |
