1969 Abarth OT vs. 2002 Dodge Intrepid
To start off, 2002 Dodge Intrepid is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Abarth OT would be higher. At 3,228 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Dodge Intrepid is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Dodge Intrepid weights approximately 760 kg more than 1969 Abarth OT.
Because 1969 Abarth OT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Abarth OT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Dodge Intrepid, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Abarth OT | 2002 Dodge Intrepid | |
Make | Abarth | Dodge |
Model | OT | Intrepid |
Year Released | 1969 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1946 cc | 3228 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 225 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1570 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 5180 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2880 mm |