1969 Abarth OT vs. 2004 Dodge Neon
To start off, 2004 Dodge Neon is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Abarth OT would be higher. At 1,946 cc (4 cylinders), 1969 Abarth OT is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1969 Abarth OT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Abarth OT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Abarth OT | 2004 Dodge Neon | |
Make | Abarth | Dodge |
Model | OT | Neon |
Year Released | 1969 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1946 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 114 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2650 mm |