1969 Abarth OT vs. 2006 Fiat Palio II
To start off, 2006 Fiat Palio II is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Abarth OT would be higher. At 1,946 cc (4 cylinders), 1969 Abarth OT is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Fiat Palio II weights approximately 565 kg more than 1969 Abarth OT.
Because 1969 Abarth OT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Abarth OT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Fiat Palio II, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Abarth OT | 2006 Fiat Palio II | |
| Make | Abarth | Fiat |
| Model | OT | Palio II |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1946 cc | 1242 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 72 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1375 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 3830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2380 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 54 L |
