1969 Abarth OT vs. 2008 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2008 Dodge Ram is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Abarth OT would be higher. At 5,654 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Dodge Ram weights approximately 935 kg more than 1969 Abarth OT.
Because 1969 Abarth OT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Abarth OT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Dodge Ram, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Abarth OT | 2008 Dodge Ram | |
| Make | Abarth | Dodge |
| Model | OT | Ram |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1946 cc | 5654 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 345 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 6 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1745 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 6300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1900 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 4080 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 129 L |
